Your Case. Our Strategy. Problem Solved.
Whether your company is closely-held or among the Fortune 500, Lurie, Zepeda, Schmalz, Hogan & Martin tailors a unique strategy to resolve your legal issues based on the facts and your goals. From negotiated settlements through trials and appeals, we apply decades of experience to efficiently pursue the best result possible.
You frequently will find our attorneys in court trying cases in front of juries, judges and administrative bodies on wide-ranging commercial litigation, including:
Successfully represented client in claims against Mercedes-Benz, USA for violation of Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. Negotiated a settlement whereby Mercedes-Benz, USA repurchased client’s Mercedes-Benz S430V.
Successfully represented client in claims against Ford Motor Company for violation of Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. Achieved arbitration award requiring Ford to repurchase client’s Ford Aviator and pay client’s attorney’s fees.
Prosecuted breach of contract claim for payment for business services rendered, and defended against cross-claims for breach of contract for services. Created and implemented a successful negotiation strategy in private mediation, resulting in a favorable settlement for client.
In an adversary proceeding in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, preserved real estate owner’s breach of contract claim against a lender and the lender’s assignee, despite defendants’ multiple motions to dismiss.
Successfully defended Deutsche Bank, AG against claims of fraud, negligent representation, and omission regarding investments. Plaintiffs sought $363 million in compensatory and punitive damages. Judge granted Deutsche Bank’s motion to dismiss based on arguments that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim for fraud or negligent misrepresentation, and the 12-year old claims had passed the applicable statute of limitations.
Won jury verdict of $3 million, increased to $4.2 million with interest, in breach of contract action for attorney-client for over 20 years’ legal fees due from his former client. Jury ruled in attorney-client’s favor for both breach of contract and professional malpractice. Affirmed on appeal in full in Rufus Von Thulen Rhoades v. William M. Lansdale et al.
Defended Texas resident against allegations, filed in the Northern District of the United States District Court, of false promises to pay for orders of wine without intent to perform. Successfully obtained court order transferring lawsuit to Texas.